User talk:TBrandley/Archive 1

November 2011[edit]

Thank you for your recent contributions, such as Instant Cash. Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft version first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, without the risk of speedy deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 22:00, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Instant Cash. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 22:09, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of programs broadcast by TB Network[edit]

Hello, TBrandley, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you worked on, List of programs broadcast by TB Network, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

It helps to explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the Help Desk. Thanks again for contributing!Template:Z79 — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:56, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

List of programs broadcast by CJON-DT (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links to Survivor, NCIS, Ringer, About a Girl, Sit Down, Shut Up and Prime Suspect

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

The Unsellables (UK TV series) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links to John Rennie, Housing and Lifestyle

List of programs broadcast by ABC Spark (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to YTV

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011[edit]

In general, a person or organization added to a list, as on List of Disney XD TV channels, should have a pre-existing article to establish notability. If you wish to create such an article, please confirm that your subject is notable according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. 117Avenue (talk) 05:43, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of programs broadcast by History Television (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Lost Worlds, The Pacific, Masterminds, MacArthur, The Kennedys, Conquest, Deadly Arts, Blowdown, Halifax, Ghost Towns and Exhibit A

News Hour (TV series) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to NHL Network and CBC Winnipeg

The Unsellables (TV series) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to British and Housing

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bunheads‎[edit]

The article Bunheads‎ has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable television PILOT which is still in development. This is not a series, there is no known premiere date, casting is in progress, and there is a chance the PILOT will never be picked up to series.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Thanks, --Logical Fuzz (talk) 01:19, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Baby Daddy (TV series)[edit]

The article Baby Daddy (TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

‎Non-notable television PILOT. This is not a series, there is no known premiere date, and there is a chance the PILOT will never be picked up to series. Only real source is a press release which says production of pilot has wrapped.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Thanks, --Logical Fuzz (talk) 01:19, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bunheads for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bunheads is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bunheads until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article..Logical Fuzz (talk) 21:57, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Baby Daddy (TV pilot) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Baby Daddy (TV pilot) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baby Daddy (TV pilot) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article..

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of programs broadcast by The Comedy Network (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to SCTV, Up All Night, Ugly Americans and House Party

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012[edit]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Allen Gregory. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. CTJF83 19:52, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of shows that started as midseason replacements for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of shows that started as midseason replacements is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of shows that started as midseason replacements until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Zzaffuto118 (talk) 01:34, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Harpreet Singh Show[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Harpreet Singh Show requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Livit⇑^Eh?/_What? 00:24, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Harpreet Singh Show for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Harpreet Singh Show is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Harpreet Singh Show until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Livit⇑^Eh?/_What? 03:42, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of programs broadcast by ABC Spark...[edit]

Just to let you know, I have proposed merging List of programs broadcast by ABC Spark into the main ABC Spark article. I think, at this point, with both articles being so short, it makes more sense to have all the information in one page. When the list gets so big that it is dominating the article about the network, then it can be moved out again. If you want to comment or object, you can do so at Talk: ABC Spark. Thanks! Livit⇑^Eh?/_What? 04:52, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

My Name Is Earl (season 1) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to English, Jason Lee and American

Disney XD (Russia) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Russian and American

List of programs broadcast by Joytv 11 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Diya and 9 B

List of video games based on Wipeout (2008 U.S. game show) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Action and John Anderson

Wipeout in the Zone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Action and Practice

List of programs broadcast by Joytv 10 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Diya

Little Britain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Come Fly with Me

Little Britain Productions (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Come Fly with Me

Wipeout Québec (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Wipeout

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation[edit]

Your addition to CKER-TV has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. History section copied word-for-word from official website: http://www.ckertv.com/maestrov/app/client/siteManager/index.php?s=101 Logical Fuzz (talk) 19:58, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with List of The Unsellables episodes[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, List of The Unsellables episodes, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.hgtv.com/hgtv/episode_archive/0,1000237,HGTV_32663_994,00.html. As a copyright violation, List of The Unsellables episodes appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. List of The Unsellables episodes has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:List of The Unsellables episodes and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:List of The Unsellables episodes with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:List of The Unsellables episodes.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Logical Fuzz (talk) 00:26, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notability[edit]

Hello TBrandley. I just wanted to give you a heads-up about the notability of articles. Not every subject is notable. Not every subject deserves its own article. A number of articles you have created recently, such as Baby Daddy (TV series), Bunheads‎, The Harpreet Singh Show, List of shows that started as midseason replacements, Wipeout (Danish game show), and Wipeout (Croatian game show) have failed the general notability guidelines put forth for Wiki. Because of this, they were deleted, redirected, or are still up for deletion at AfD ([1],[2]). This is because the subject was not notable. That is, it had not:

1) received significant coverage from

2) reliable sources

3) independent of the subject.

Please review the guidelines before creating more articles in the future. This way you will not waste your time on articles that will be deleted or redirected. Thanks! --Logical Fuzz (talk) 18:50, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your article has been moved to AfC space[edit]

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:TBrandley/The Flintstones (2013 TV series) has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Flintstones (2013 TV series), this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 06:10, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the Help desk or on the reviewer's talk page
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

TBrandley (talk) 17:58, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Flintstones (2013 TV series)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Flintstones (2013 TV series), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. MikeWazowski (talk) 18:05, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to The Flintstones, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. MikeWazowski (talk) 21:03, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Wipeout (game show) games[edit]

Category:Wipeout (game show) games, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 00:20, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Worst Driver television franchise (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to VTM and Top Gear

Shut That Door! (TV series) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to ATV

Who Wants to Be a Millionaire: Canadian Edition (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to CTV

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation[edit]

Your addition to Big Nate: Strikes Again has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Plot section copied word-for-word from http://www.bookapex.com/Big-Nate-Strikes-Again-006194436X.htm Logical Fuzz (talk) 02:31, 18 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Disney XD (Russia) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Disney XD (Russia) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disney XD (Russia) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.--Template:Fontcolor John Chen (Talk-Contib.) RA 03:01, 18 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

The Loser List (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Scholastic

The Loser List: Revenge of the Loser (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Scholastic

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Bean (character)[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Mr. Bean (character), and it appears to include material copied directly from zimbio.com

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)Template:Z119 CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:06, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mr. Bean (character)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mr. Bean (character) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 04:55, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tina Belcher for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tina Belcher is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tina Belcher until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ZZArch ^{talk to me} 02:06, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of TV Parental Guidelines (Tateland)[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as TV Parental Guidelines (Tateland), is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GILO A&E⇑ 03:41, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Bean[edit]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Mr. Bean. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Logical Cowboy (talk) 00:55, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Bean's Christmas Vacation listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mr. Bean's Christmas Vacation. Since you had some involvement with the Mr. Bean's Christmas Vacation redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Logical Cowboy (talk) 01:01, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Tina Belcher (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Al, Gloria, Crawl Space and Gayle

Bob Belcher (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Crawl Space, Dial 'M' for Monkey and Sacred Cow

Mr. Bean (character) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to British, Childish and Scrapper

Gene Belcher (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Crawl Space

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

100 Greatest Cartoons[edit]

I've speedily deleted the article, as it was a recreation of the previous article. Per the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/100 Greatest TV Moments, this and all similar articles violate TV4's copyrights.—Kww(talk) 02:30, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's the list that is copyrighted. I'm deleting it again. If you recreate it again, you will be blocked from editing.—Kww(talk) 02:36, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

TB Network[edit]

Reviewing your edit history, I note that you have created numerous hoax articles about the fictional "TB Network". Most of your contributions seem to be in good faith, however, so I am not going to block your account at this time. Consider this your only warning, though: if I see you creating further hoax articles, you will be blocked.—Kww(talk) 12:53, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Disney Channel (Kazakhstan) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Disney Channel (Kazakhstan) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disney Channel (Kazakhstan) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Template:Fontcolor John Chen (Talk-Contib.) RA 01:14, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Speckerman Recurrence[edit]

I redirected The Speckerman Recurrence because, once the unsourced, original research and non-notable trivia is removed, the article becomes essentially a plot-only description, which fails WP:PLOT. The references in the article do not establish notability and the only ratings figure is already in the season article, so it just reproduces information that is already available in another, pre-existing article. Without significant additional information that establishes notability the article should not exist. --AussieLegend (talk) 12:36, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Flat 2, 12 Arbour Road, London, England[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Flat 2, 12 Arbour Road, London, England, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Yasht101 (talk) 05:31, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Flat 2, 12 Arbour Road, London, England. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Fictional addresses do not get articles. Creating unworthy articles like this is a waste of other editors' time. Logical Cowboy (talk) 06:16, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fox VOD[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Fox VOD requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Logical Cowboy (talk) 06:23, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gene Belcher for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gene Belcher is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gene Belcher until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Logical Cowboy (talk) 06:27, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bear Paws (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Crackers and Cracker

Fox's Animation Domination (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Rival and Kevin Reilly

The Cay (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Theodore Taylor and Douglas Stewart

Fox (India) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to DTH

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Animation Domination[edit]

Category:Animation Domination, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 01:11, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TBrandley for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Logical Cowboy (talk) 05:15, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, The Loser List: Revenge of the Loser[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, The Loser List: Revenge of the Loser. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - The Loser List (series). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at The Loser List (series) - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. DGG ( talk ) 04:34, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

the above is the formal notice, generated by the program. But speaking more personally, as I would prefer: The book may possibly become a best seller, but until it does, I think it would be covered well enough in the main article. I don't even think there should be a cross-referencem until it gets published; then one would be appropriate. For the first book in the series, I merged the plot contents into the main article and changed it to a redirect. The principle I go by is that it is better to have one strong article than 3 very weak ones. If you know of any reviews for them published in references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases, then add links to them--that's what's needed in an article on a book; that's what's of use to the reader. I hope you agree. DGG ( talk ) 04:43, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Video games based on Fox network shows[edit]

Category:Video games based on Fox network shows, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 15:04, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Springfield Road, Kelowna for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Springfield Road, Kelowna is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Springfield Road, Kelowna until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Logical Cowboy (talk) 00:53, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New What Were They Thinking? article[edit]

		The Original Barnstar
		Thanks for your efforts in creating the new What Were They Thinking? article; it is appreciated. Northamerica1000^(talk) 10:13, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Fox Movies (Portugal) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Horror and Action

Key & Peele (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ian Roberts

List of television programming blocks (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Super Sunday

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Call 2 Win for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Call 2 Win is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Call 2 Win until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Logical Cowboy (talk) 15:52, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page[edit]

Please see WP:NFCC#9. Unfortunately, non-free files are not allowed in the userspace, so the image of Peter Griffin should be removed. Chris the Paleontologist (talk • contribs) 22:56, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Logopedia[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Logopedia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Nat Gertler (talk) 00:11, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Logopedia[edit]

Hi TBrandley, you recently removed a deletion tag from Logopedia. Because Wikipedia policy does not allow the creator of the page to remove speedy deletion tags, an automated program has replaced the tag. Although the deletion proposal may be incorrect, removing the tag is not the correct way for you to contest the deletion, even if you are more experienced than the nominator. Instead, please use the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. Remember to be patient, there is no harm in waiting for another experienced user to review the deletion and judge what the right course of action is. As you are involved, and therefore potentially biased, you should refrain from doing this yourself. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 00:20, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Big Bang Theory move discussion[edit]

Thanks for your vote at The Big Bang Theory requested move. When determining the outcome of such discussions we rely on the rationale behind a vote, and not just the vote itself, to determine consensus. Votes with no rationale can be discarded. To avoid this happening to your vote, please visit Talk:The Big Bang Theory#Requested move and expand upon your vote with a rationale. This will ensure that your vote is not wasted. --AussieLegend (talk) 02:50, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fox Television Studios[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content as you did at Fox Television Studios. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Logical Cowboy (talk) 02:53, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of District Policing Partnerships[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on District Policing Partnerships requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Logical Cowboy (talk) 05:22, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Articles waiting for more information to be released from February 2012[edit]

Category:Articles waiting for more information to be released from February 2012, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Logical Cowboy (talk) 23:35, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Disney Channel (Kazakhstan)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Disney Channel (Kazakhstan), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. JayJay^{Talk to me} 23:48, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, TBrandley. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! JayJay^{Talk to me} 23:50, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy Delete Tag[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Disney Channel (Kazakhstan), a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. JayJay^{Talk to me} 23:53, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Disney Channel (Kazakhstan). If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. JayJay^{Talk to me} 23:56, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Disney Channel (Kazakhstan). If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 00:32, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 4Rivers Smokehouse[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 4Rivers Smokehouse requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Logical Fuzz (talk) 00:53, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No award[edit]

Just to be clear, there is no award for most articles created then instantly deleted. Creating trivial articles that violate WP:CSD, WP:GNG, and WP:RS makes a lot of extra work for other editors. Please read these guidelines carefully and keep in mind the time of other editors if you create future articles. Thank you. Logical Cowboy (talk) 01:14, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Upcoming television series[edit]

Template:Upcoming television series has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Logical Fuzz (talk) 01:33, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bob Belcher for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bob Belcher is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Belcher until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JayJay^{Talk to me} 03:04, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of What Were They Thinking? for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article What Were They Thinking? is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/What Were They Thinking? until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JayJay^{Talk to me} 03:17, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Allen Gregory[edit]

Template:Allen Gregory has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Logical Fuzz (talk) 20:54, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Other websites[edit]

Template:Other websites has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Logical Fuzz (talk) 21:04, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox snack[edit]

Template:Infobox snack has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Logical Fuzz (talk) 21:19, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Archway (cookie company) listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Archway (cookie company). Since you had some involvement with the Archway (cookie company) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). JayJay^{Talk to me} 21:45, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of FOX (Tateland)[edit]

A tag has been placed on FOX (Tateland), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.

If you can fix the redirect to point to a mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DASHBot (talk) 06:01, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PROD notifications[edit]

Hey Tate. Back in November, you got a PROD notification ("Proposed deletion of List of programs broadcast by TB Network" above), and it was during one of the template testing project's experiments. If you could go here and leave us some feedback about what you think about the new versions of the templates we tested (there are links to the templates), that would be very useful. (You can also email me at swallingwikimedia.org if you want.) Thanks! Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 19:12, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Big Bang Theory[edit]

Please discuss your proposed change to the primary topic of Big Bang Theory at Talk:Big Bang Theory. Repeatedly changing contrary to the last consensus is disruptive. -- JHunterJ (talk) 22:10, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced material[edit]

Do not restore unsourced material to articles, as you did here. Also, do not revert other editors changes without providing an edit summary.—Kww(talk) 17:53, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Fox's Animation Domination shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Logical Fuzz (talk) 20:15, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of television series notable for positive reception[edit]

The article List of television series notable for positive reception has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no indication of notability. Random collection of TV series.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 20:33, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of television series notable for positive reception for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of television series notable for positive reception is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of television series notable for positive reception until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. noq (talk) 20:37, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of a day for edit warring, as you did at Fox's Animation Domination. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. $Salvio$ ^{Let's talk about it!} 21:04, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Optik TV channels (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Mandarin, A&E, RDI, ONE (TV channel), The Score, Punjabi, On demand and TSN

Bob Belcher (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Crawl Space, Dial 'M' for Monkey and Sacred Cow

List of programs broadcast by BiteTV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Arrested Development and Papillon

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:10, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your tagging of The Office (UK TV series) as a "Good article"[edit]

Hello TBrandley. Please note that you cannot just randomly tag articles with the {{good article}} template, as you did here to The Office (UK TV series) and here to Fox's Animation Domination. This template is only for articles which have gone through a nomination process and meet specific article criteria. Of course, you are welcome to clean up the article to meets the standards, and then nominate it. I'd suggest you take a look at some television articles in the Good Articles/Arts category to see what a Good Article should look like. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 22:28, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Napoleon Dynamite[edit]

Category:Napoleon Dynamite, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 10:07, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

		The Programming Block Barnstar
		For creating the WikiProject Programming Blocks. TBrandley (talk) 01:29, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cut and paste moves[edit]

Please do not perform cut and paste moves, as you have with Template:Infobox programming block, it splits the page history, which is highly undesirable. If a redirect is preventing an uncontroversial move, you can tag it for speedy deletion with the {{db-move}} template. I have listed the page at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen, which will call an administrator to fix the issue, if there are other cut and paste moves you have preformed, please list them there as well. Thanks, 117Avenue (talk) 04:57, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Help:WikiProject[edit]

I have been bold and changed your new page Help:WikiProject into a redirect to Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Guide. That's the main page for the WikiProject help resources. What do you think? -- John of Reading (talk) 07:19, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TBrandley for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. JayJay^{Talk to me} 21:25, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also you may want to use one of these for User:Tate.B.Stockwell if not your account may be blocked JayJay^{Talk to me} 22:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Fox's Animation Domination. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Don't source to promotional Facebook pages, and especially not Wikipedia articles. And don't synthesize theories about programming directions, especially in regards to the Saturday block. thank you. Nate • (chatter) 03:48, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:TV-14 episodes of The Simpsons[edit]

Category:TV-14 episodes of The Simpsons, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 08:56, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of TV-14 episodes of The Simpsons for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of TV-14 episodes of The Simpsons is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of TV-14 episodes of The Simpsons until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. I strongly urge you to learn our article guidelines; we are not the place to put every bit of possible minutia about a television series. Nate • (chatter) 09:32, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Key & Peele characters (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Dish, Hell's Kitchen and Bitch

List of Canadian animated television series (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Teletoon

List of Canadian network television schedules (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Schedule

List of TV-14 episodes of The Simpsons (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sexual

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:The Programming Block Barnstar[edit]

Template:The Programming Block Barnstar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Logical Cowboy (talk) 06:24, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Request for comments[edit]

Hello, you are welcome to contribute to the following page.

WP:Requests for comment/TBrandley

Thanks.

Logical Cowboy (talk) 06:05, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Programming Blocks[edit]

New WikiProjects are typically not created on a whim by one person but through discussion with other interested wiki-editors. Articles and topics that would be covered by the project you created, Wikipedia:WikiProject Programming Blocks, would already be within the broader Wikipedia:WikiProject Television. Programming blocks may be best suited as a task force under that project, but if I were you, I'd add a message on the TV Project talk page to find out the best way to get your project off the ground and if there are other interested editors in helping you with it. See if you can get a discussion going there first; otherwise, I'm afraid the project will be nominated for deletion. To gain the respect of the community, it is probably best that you listen to what others tell you when they have concerns and engage in meaningful discussion with them. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 20:41, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Chrome TOC[edit]

Template:Chrome TOC has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Logical Fuzz (talk) 23:28, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Murder She Solved: True Crime for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Murder She Solved: True Crime is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder She Solved: True Crime until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Logical Cowboy (talk) 01:36, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of DCHK[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on DCHK requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Logical Cowboy (talk) 04:22, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hoax pages[edit]

If you create another hoax page anywhere in Wikipedia, you will be blocked. It doesn't matter if it's in user space or main space, there is no need for pages about Tateland or the TB Network.—Kww(talk) 04:31, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use logos on userpages...[edit]

Are not allowed. Please read our fair use and logos use policies, and note that I have removed the Chelsea crest from your userpage template, and the Bob's Burgers logo from the userbox regarding the show. Do not add it again, and I implore you to read our policies before continuing to edit. Thank you. Nate • (chatter) 06:31, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ani[edit]

Please see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Disruptive_editing.2C_content_creation Nobody Ent 10:53, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestive dialogue listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Suggestive dialogue. Since you had some involvement with the Suggestive dialogue redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Logical Cowboy (talk) 18:03, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Request for comments--Response requested[edit]

Hello, I would like to mention again, in case you missed it the first time, that you are very welcome to contribute to the following page.

WP:Requests for comment/TBrandley

Other editors have provided comments and feedback on your edits. I think it would be valuable for the community for you to repond in the Response section, Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/TBrandley#Response.

Thank you.

Logical Cowboy (talk) 18:19, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Force Four Entertainment[edit]

Hi. Regardless of what happens at the current AfD, I'd encourage you to write a referenced article on Force Four Entertainment, even a stub. If not, I could see Category:Television series by Force Four Entertainment possibly being taken to CfD, as a category with no parent article. Just a suggestion. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:08, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fox's AD listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fox's AD. Since you had some involvement with the Fox's AD redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Logical Cowboy (talk) 00:08, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012[edit]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to List of Key & Peele characters. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. MikeWazowski (talk) 00:17, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect issue[edit]

Please stop creating spurious redirects and categories without any consensus. The 30th Century Fox Television redirect should not redirect to the show's article for instance, but to the studio as the in-joke involves the studio's name. You are exhausting the patience of other editors with this behavior, and your continued silence in the request for comment above is not helping your cause. Correct your behavior and read our guidelines. Thank you. Nate • (chatter) 07:03, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Claire Freeland for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Claire Freeland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claire Freeland until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Nate • (chatter) 07:14, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject Programming Blocks[edit]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Programming Blocks, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Programming Blocks and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Programming Blocks during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 02:58, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Request for comments--Third request[edit]

Hello, I would like to mention again, in case you missed it, that you are welcome to contribute to the following page.

WP:Requests for comment/TBrandley

Other editors have provided comments and feedback on your edits. I think it would be valuable for the community for you to respond in the Response section, Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/TBrandley#Response.

Thank you.

Logical Cowboy (talk) 20:05, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

blocked[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for chronic creation of articles and redirects despite a hundred requests to stop. I found it particularly telling that your response to the RFC on this problem came in the middle of you creating a redundant series of redirects. Not before, not after, but right in the middle of the process. I will unblock you when you assure me that you will respond to messages on your talk pages, and subject to an agreement to cease creating any new articles or redirects for a period of 30 days.. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

—Kww(talk) 00:22, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Unblock reviewed --TBrandley (talk) 00:33, 5 March 2012 (UTC) Thanks --TBrandley (talk) 00:41, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the delay. My screwup. You should be unblocked now.—Kww(talk) 03:39, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine --TBrandley (talk) 03:42, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Synchronized Swimming (Bob's Burgers)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Synchronized Swimming (Bob's Burgers). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - List_of_Bob's_Burgers_episodes#unscheduled_episodes. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at List_of_Bob's_Burgers_episodes#unscheduled_episodes - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Taylornate (talk) 10:02, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 5[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Force Four Entertainment (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to The Ties That Bind and John Ritchie

Fugget About It (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Danny Smith and Teletoon

!Q'Viva!: The Chosen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to TLN

Strangely Uplifting (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to American

The Bachelor Canada (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Host

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2013 in television listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2013 in television. Since you had some involvement with the 2013 in television redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Nate • (chatter) 19:02, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2013 and beyond in television for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2013 and beyond in television is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013 and beyond in television until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Nate • (chatter) 19:17, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violation of unblock agreement. You agreed not to create any articles or redirects before April 4, 2012, yet today we have Nickelodeon Croatia. Why did you create this redirect?—Kww(talk) 22:00, 6 March 2012 (UTC). If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.[reply]

Template:Unblock reviewed Template:Unblock reviewed

Question[edit]

How can I get unblocked on Wikipedia? Tate Brandley Stockwell 23:00, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Prove to administrators that you understand why what you did was wrong and make sure that you don't violate any of our rules in the future. May I also suggest you get a mentor to help you in your struggles. Also you should read the guide to appealing blocks as well. Hghyux (talk) 00:19, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think you need to wait some time, at least a few months, then explain that you truly understand and will not repeat the actions that led here (and you will not receive much benefit of the doubt even then). I certainly would not unblock you right now for a number of reasons no matter what you said. For one, you have caused a very large number of hours wasted that could have been spent by others doing other useful things. The huge number of warning messages above from disparate people, and the actions those people had to take before leaving them (fixing problems nominating articles for deletion, etc.) attests to this. For that reason, unblocking you does not appear to be in the best interests of the encyclopedia. But your post above makes it far worse in my view. Simply put, it is not even a little credible that after all the warnings, and after blocks, you "forgot" what not to do, plus Salvio advises that you were unblocked once before and returned to bad behavior.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:34, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think a good idea would be for the user to get a mentor. That may be enough as there is decent potential for productivity. Perhaps if we could get someone that has the knowledge and abilities to help someone like this user we could get him to have a full understanding on the rules and not forget. Remember that this user has legitimately requested for help and my best solution that will be fast and make sure that he doesn't lose interest in editing is to get a mentor. Maybe an admin would be willing to consider this as an option. Hghyux (talk) 01:12, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, no, what if he *lost interest in editing*?! Why, then people wouldn't get to clean up after him anymore! Some of them might even be forced to get back to building the encyclopedia! We have to avoid that at all costs! In all seriousness, mentoring isn't going to fix basic WP:COMPETENCE issues, and ultimately Wikipedia is not therapy. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:50, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Have some compassion for goodness sake! While Wikipedia is not therapy, it is also a place where you can help users who have editing struggles. If we gave him a mentor then we could shape him into a good editor, which could benefit the encyclopedia. I am a believer in WP:AGF and can pick out the difference between someone who can become productive and one who can't. Give him a mentor, and if he does not improve in a week then block him for good. Hghyux (talk to me)(talk to others) 02:26, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hghyux, I admire your ability to spot talent. You seem to have a lot of insight into this issue, so why don't you volunteer to be his mentor? Logical Cowboy (talk) 02:29, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would do that gladly, but I have been editing for just over a month. In this scenario as long as my job is to make sure he does not create a new article then I can do that. Would that be something that could be given to this user as an editing restriction rather than a full scale block as that seems more appropriate. Hghyux (talk to me)(talk to others) 03:10, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, because the user responsible for User:Hghyux/FUNZONE is definitely capable of forcing Brandley not to create inappropriate pages. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 03:22, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's because I have a sense of humor and am actually a trained comedian. Read my userboxes! Also, I did not create it in main space and it is meant for humor in my user space and put the appropriate notice at the top. I believe that having 100% neutrality all the time can make you a stuffy person. Read WP:Humor. I am knowledgeable on how to appropriately prevent someone from creating articles. But if you don't mind I would reccomend 2 users I have crossed paths with who may be appropriate for the job.

User:Worm_That_Turned - An admin who mentors lots of people and even reached out to me with something I needed help with. User:N419BH - A former mentor who may want a replacement. I think if either are willing, they would be happy to take the job. Hghyux (talk to me)(talk to others) 03:37, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you cannot go a few days without editing I suggest in you look at some of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines first. Right now you have not shown you have even taken a look at a policy and desperately trying to get unblocked to return to your old editing habits. JayJay^{Talk to me} 03:51, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stan Smith (American Dad!)[edit]

I took a second look at your "vandalism reversion" on this page, and there was no vandalism at all. It was a test edit by an IP playing with the buttons and seeing if the changes did stick, which hardly did any harm at all. You had no business reverting this as vandalism and should have left a welcome template on the IP's talk page, which I will do now. This is exactly why I stepped in against you using rollback. Nate • (chatter) 08:01, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox snack listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Infobox snack. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Infobox snack redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). TJRC (talk) 00:54, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

Template:Unblock reviewed

What do you plan on doing if I unblock you? If I unblocked you with the agreement that you are to spend the next 30 days editing, with no creation of articles, redirects, lists, or templates, would you abide by it?—Kww(talk) 20:46, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Tate Brandley Stockwell 20:48, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) TBrandley; you have to realize that you are skating on VERY thin ice here. You had better abide by your agreement that was made here. If you create ANY articles, redirects, lists, or templates before May 1 2012 there will be several admins that will not hesitate in placing an indef block on you and this time nobody would be willing to unblock on something as simple as the promise you made here. You've been given a very rare third chance; don't screw it up! Barts1a / Talk to me / Help me improve 22:52, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that, i can upload files because it wasn't mention it right? Tate Brandley Stockwell 22:54, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Files are fine. But not too many otherwise it could be seen as an attempt to game the system! Barts1a / Talk to me / Help me improve 22:56, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

TBrandley is honoring the letter of the agreement. By trying to close the loophole, I created a new one. I won't reinstate the block based on it, but I am watching closely.—Kww(talk) 23:21, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

TBrandley... you are approaching the "Too many" rather rapidly here! I would suggest that you STOP uploading files for at least the next week! Barts1a / Talk to me / Help me improve 23:48, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would also STRONGLY suggest that you NOT try to push the boundaries like this... It becomes too easy to overstep them and find yourself "Locked up with the key thrown away"! Barts1a / Talk to me / Help me improve 23:53, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) And yet, despite two chances and all the advice about not pushing limits, we get this edit at Touch (2012 TV series). If I can still read with reasonable comprehension, the terms of the unblock included no lists, yet off he goes within minutes of being unblocked, and adds an irrelevant list of Canadian ratings to the article on an American TV show. I'm all for second chances and forgiveness, but this editor simply isn't able to abide by the simple terms of his own unblock agreement, no matter how many times he promises to. --Drmargi (talk) 02:11, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That is most certainly a violation of the unblock agreement. Barts1a / Talk to me / Help me improve 04:52, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That edit doesn't violate his unblock agreement. It would get immediately overturned if I blocked for it. Calm down a bit: I unblocked with a specific set of conditions, and TBrandley is living within them.—Kww(talk) 10:57, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Calm down? Everyone here seems perfectly calm, and I have no bone to pick with anyone here. That said, does your unblock agreement, dated yesterday, not say "If I unblocked you with the agreement that you are to spend the next 30 days editing, with no creation of articles, redirects, lists, or templates, would you abide by it?" to which the TBrandley replies, "Yes."? How, then, is TBrandley hopping over to Touch minutes later to create an irrelevant list of Canadian ratings for an American show not a violation? I came to this talk page to leave him a message about not adding superfluous lists of statistics on the article, found this, and felt it was appropriate to comment here, given the edit of concern seemed to be a pretty clear-cut violation of the block agreement. This is an editor with whom I'm not terribly familiar, but I have noticed a couple ANI's and his tendency to add superfluous content to the project, much of which is deleted quickly, and I have no particular investment in his being blocked. My only concern is the pattern of saying "I won't do it again" followed by fairly speedy violations that's readily apparent to fresh eyes, and an edit that clearly is the latest of a long line of inappropriate edits of concern to more than one admin. --Drmargi (talk) 16:38, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think the unblock agreement has to do with creation of any new articles, lists, templates, etc., and not on the addition of material to existing articles. Maybe that should be clarified. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 17:48, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars has my intention correct: the primary source of TBrandley's editing difficulties has been the constant creation of new things, not the additions to articles, so that is what his unblock restrictions focus on. That doesn't mean that I am giving automatic blessing to his additions to existing articles: editors should feel free to revert or edit those additions as they see fit. There's a huge gap between "won't block over" and "think is perfect".—Kww(talk) 18:16, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Animation Domination[edit]

Your logo has been removed and should not be readded; Logopedia should never be used as a logo source, especially as they have no regards to respect of copyright that I know of and their site's actual page for the image has no source for it. Nate • (chatter) 22:26, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Animation Domination title card.jpeg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Animation Domination title card.jpeg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

sourced to Logopedia, which fails to disclaim where they acquired the image in the first place, so no proper following of copyright disclaiming can be done for this image

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Nate • (chatter) 22:32, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Fox Studios Australia logo.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Fox Studios Australia logo.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

sourced to Logopedia, which fails to disclaim where they acquired the image in the first place, so no proper following of copyright disclaiming can be done for this image

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Nate • (chatter) 22:37, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Skating too close to the edge[edit]

Consider your prohibition on creating redirects to include creating hatnotes directing readers to different articles. This edit, where you created a television episode hat note that functions like a soft redirect is another example of the extremely bad judgment that you show. What benefit is it to direct the reader of an article about the proposition "2+2=5" to a television episode titled "1+1=3"?

Poor judgment is the underlying problem here, and you really have to work on it. You have this enormous pile of warnings, messages from editors encouraging me to block you again, and why? Because you create things without any restraint. Slow down. Think. Remember that a trivial, tiny, miniscule percentage of our readers will ever look up a television episode by title.—Kww(talk) 18:16, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

1channel.ch[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to 1channel.ch. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--74.34.68.186 (talk) 02:48, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Safety in Numbers[edit]

Please read WP:DAB#Usage guidelines; piping is not allowed beyond technical exceptions, and most people will just go to Touch (2012 TV series)#Episodes to get an episode description for now because of the series' newness thus your edit has been reverted. Nate • (chatter) 05:21, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Big Bang Theory characters[edit]

Would you please regard at least one page about acceptable sources? Just one, please? Even to humor me, I'll take it. You don't source to Facebook pages. Not to Wikipedia articles. Certainly not to UrbanDictionary, which could make Bazinga some kind of dirty sexual position if they wanted to because it's a user-generated content site with few controls to stop anyone from making something up. Here's what I want you to read: Wikipedia:Verifiability. Learn it. Read it. Respect it. And stop sourcing to things that pretty much exist to create urban legends or free advertising here. Thank you. Nate • (chatter) 04:47, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

TBrandley; need I remind you that you are on EXTREMELY thin ice here! You should have known by now that user generated content such as Urban Dictionary is never accepted here except under VERY RARE circumstances! That stunt you pulled at 2+2=5 didn't help either! The ice is 1nm away from cracking. Tread carefully lest that last nm melt away too! Barts1a / Talk to me / Help me improve 07:51, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How many more chances are you gonna give him? He has not responded nor acknowledged that he is very close to being blocked AGAIN. Clearly this user has no respect for Wikipedia's rules and guidelines JayJay^{Talk to me} 17:03, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am not in charge of that so I have no real idea. It's up to the admins to make the decision to block. Kww seems to be the most active admin RE: this person so why not ask them? Barts1a / Talk to me / Help me improve 22:24, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You will have to persuade me that TBrandley is being actually disruptive: edit-warring, repeatedly making the same class of edit despite a community consensus that they are inappropriate, etc. I can't block him for being a bad editor unless it gets beyond this level of disharmony.—Kww(talk) 23:36, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your move to wikiquote[edit]

While Wikiquote and Wikipedia are separate and as such sanctions on one do not apply on the other; Your actions on wikiquote such as creating pages and redirects about the SAME things that got you into trouble over here can cause you to be blocked here again and possibly even be blocked there too! Barts1a / Talk to me / Help me improve 23:32, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

They may get him in trouble over there, but I can only consider his actions on Wikipedia.—Kww(talk) 23:35, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The page I created on the wikiquote, Touch (TV series), was translated from the Italian Wikiquote to the English Wikiquote --Tate Brandley Stockwell 23:44, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stop translating things with Google Translate on any wiki. You had major problems on other wikis with badly translated articles from en using GT, as I noted in your Request for Comment; items like that require someone versed in their native language to deal with and I don't see anywhere that you are versed in Italian, and using a translation from another wiki is no excuse for creating an poorly written article. Also, let's wait until Touch actually gets a second season before we begin to quote it; we are not under any deadline to create content here. Nate • (chatter) 02:53, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fox and Animation Domination images[edit]

What did I tell you on Tuesday about sourcing images? That they must list where they came from. Please follow our fair use guildelines. Your logo has again been removed because it doesn't tell us where it's from and is certainly not meeting fair use guidelines, which list that corporate images should be no larger than 500 pixels, and it would be very advisable to find an image that does not contain any animated characters. The first Fox logo from the Fox article has also been removed as clearly a violation of the rules of Commons; no corporate logos and incorrect copyright, and the second Fox logo is gone because it adds nothing to the article and we've had this discussion years ago that articles should not have galleries unless there's a good reason. Also, the searchlight element clearly makes it a copyrighted image, not public domain.

Please read WP:FAIRUSE.
Please read COMMONS:LICENSING; only free images are allowed there.

Thank you. Nate • (chatter) 05:08, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 10[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of programs broadcast by Global (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to The Firm, Ringer, Glee and The Good Wife

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TV network logos[edit]

Don't change things in items under deletion unless it involves vandalism or adding a source to something. Your edit has been reverted here. Thank you. Nate • (chatter) 22:36, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Animation Domination copy-paste move...[edit]

I have reverted this. Page histories must be maintained, and you have not done this move correctly (as you have been warned with previous copy-paste moves), and most of all, one vote doesn't mean a consensus by any means. Please wait for an administrator and plenty of consensus before making this move. Thank you. Nate • (chatter) 00:32, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SpoilerTV[edit]

SpoilerTV is not a reliable source for episode information used in TV articles. Please be careful to use appropriate media such as TV Guide when sourcing information about TV series. --Drmargi (talk) 04:10, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kathy Cox[edit]

Please, before you edit, read an article before you make changes. It's pretty darned obvious that this edit was the result of not paying attention, and to many editors can be considered disruptive editing. Nate • (chatter) 04:37, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kathy Cox, you may be blocked from editing. Logical Cowboy (talk) 06:10, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Simpsons[edit]

Hi. I have removed the broadcast section you added. It was incomplete and unproperly sourced, but mainly if it was complete it would be a horribly long trivial mess that doesn't belong here. A broadcast section is good possible addition, but it would be in prose and similar to that in Cold Feet, for example. Gran² 21:43, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 17[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Don't Trust the B---- in Apartment 23, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rogers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced episode summaries[edit]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Missing (TV series). Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.

Once an unsourced summary is reverted, the worst move you can make is revert again; that will simply get you warned and possibly blocked for edit warring. --Drmargi (talk) 22:25, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced titles[edit]

Please do not add "Tales of the Red Thread" or any other alternative title for the Pilot of Touch (2012 TV series) without a reliable source, as you have done more than once. There is a discussion of the correct title on the show's talk page. Please avoid an edit war by contributing to the discussion. --Drmargi (talk) 01:06, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

{{help me}}

It has been 30 days, so is it okay to create articles, which will not get deleted? Tate Brandley Stockwell 21:55, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing restriction is over. Please go slowly and think carefully, though. The purpose of your thirty day restriction was so that you would slow down and see what kind of articles are kept. If you immediately start creating so many bad articles that it disrupts all of our processes again, you will wind up blocked again. You seem to want to edit well, so I hope that doesn't happen.—Kww(talk) 22:05, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2012–13 United States network television schedule[edit]

I saw your edit on the schedule. You made the article for Ready to Love. That was a song. Please remember that. 76.116.112.84 (talk) 23:24, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edit on the 2012–13 United States network television schedule page just now. Please leave it as it is. AdamDeanHall (talk) 22:34, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Glass House (2012 TV series)[edit]

The article The Glass House (2012 TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

per WP:CRYSTAL

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 04:23, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Bob's Burgers compare.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Bob's Burgers compare.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:05, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling[edit]

If you're going to write articles about Missing (TV series) articles, please be sure to check your spelling of the name Michael carefully. Your article on the pilot repeatedly misspells his name, and it's not another editor's job to clean up after you. --Drmargi (talk) 18:40, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jimmyjr.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jimmyjr.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. We hope (talk) 13:04, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Andyollie.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Andyollie.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. We hope (talk) 13:04, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jimmypesto.png listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jimmypesto.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. We hope (talk) 13:04, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Louise Belcher.png listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Louise Belcher.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. We hope (talk) 13:04, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gene Belcher.png listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gene Belcher.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. We hope (talk) 13:04, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tina Belcher.png listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tina Belcher.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. We hope (talk) 13:04, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:List of Bob's Burgers characters.png listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:List of Bob's Burgers characters.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. We hope (talk) 13:04, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bob Belcher.png listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bob Belcher.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. We hope (talk) 13:04, 7 May 2012 (UTC) We hope (talk) 13:04, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Simpsons FamilyPicture (no background).png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Simpsons FamilyPicture (no background).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:37, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Goodwin Games[edit]

The article The Goodwin Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and looks like WP:CRYSTAL

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. →TheSpecialUser^Talk_{Contributions} 15:22, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The quality of your recent TV articles[edit]

Please put a little more effort into the TV articles that you create. These one sentence articles here and here without a source or category are unnecessary. This and this weren't much better. The Goodwin Games was first tagged for speedy delete, and then prod before I rescued it. If you cannot at least add a reference and one category to the articles you create, then don't bother to create them. It's not that hard, and it is surely not asking too much of you. You should know better. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 19:05, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your return to bad habits[edit]

I blocked you earlier for overloading our deletion system with bad articles. Your volume isn't as disruptively high as it used to be, but articles like this represent a return to the habits that got you blocked. Don't continue this.—Kww(talk) 10:52, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bob's Burgers (season 1) episodes[edit]

Category:Bob's Burgers (season 1) episodes, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 01:16, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Awake (TV series)[edit]

Template:Awake (TV series) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 00:47, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ed Awake TV.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ed Awake TV.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:16, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Micheal Awake pass out.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Micheal Awake pass out.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:18, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Awake[edit]

I see you have contributed to the Awake articles. Before interest in the series is lost forever, you might want to consider expanding episode articles and templates now while contributors are still engaged. If the Awake article and episode articles reach GA status, there could be an Awake Good Topic. --Another Believer _(Talk) 16:47, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do the other episodes from the season (ones without existing articles) need to be expanded to GA status as well? --Another Believer _(Talk) 00:29, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:WIAGT. Tate Brandley Stockwell 00:30, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Awake GAN[edit]

Hello, TBrandley. If Awake is going to be a Good Article, we need to make a major expansion to the article, specifically in the "Critical reception" and "Production" sections. I can help you with the reception section and we can use several refs from the Pilot (Awake) article. We also need to expand the lead a bit. Thanks. Guy546^(Talk) 17:44, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the help Tate Brandley Stockwell 17:46, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The OT[edit]

I have reverted this to a redirect. It's basically just a quick show meant to fill time with scores and analysis, and not deserving of an article; it's about the same as an average halftime summary show. Also, the show has no current logo to speak of, it just uses the regular graphics with the title voiced out. Nate • (chatter) 05:19, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. Tate Brandley Stockwell 15:46, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Awake GA "Turtles All the Way Down"[edit]

There are some serious stylistic issues with the sourcing for "Turtles All the Way Down". Before anyone reviews this, you should desperately clear these up, a la the previous article or the episode's parent article. Nice-looking citations are critical to passing a GA, although they don't have to be perfect; however, having a source (nay, five) that merely say "Examiner.com" will not cut it. Please fix these up and I'll take a look at the article. I appreciate your energy, however.

Also, If you ever have any free time, maybe you'd be willing to review one of my articles that are in the queue? I'm trying to get those cut down.--Gen. Quon (talk) 15:26, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For sure, I would be able to review your article, you name it, I can see lots of The X-Files and The Office articles. I wasn't sure if i can review it, because I am not an admin. Tate Brandley Stockwell 21:58, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You don't have to be an admin to review. You just have to have a sharp eye. Any of the X-Files articles would be great, although The Office ones would be appreciated as well.--Gen. Quon (talk) 00:26, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Awake GAs[edit]

Hey, good work on "Turtles All the Way Down". "Two Birds" is still on hold and has a few issues before it can be promoted, and time is ticking. Just thought I'd drop in and remind you. Cheers.--Gen. Quon (talk) 23:29, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and tweaked the "Two Birds" article and promoted it. Good work and thanks for reviewing some of my X-Files pages.--Gen. Quon (talk) 00:11, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of American Idol (season 12) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article American Idol (season 12) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Idol (season 12) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 12:10, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The OT.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The OT.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have questions, please post them here.
I will automatically remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please ask an admin to turn it off here.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 12:52, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Touch title card.png listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Touch title card.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. - Jrobb525 22:45, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Little Guy GA Review[edit]

I've swept through parts of the article, but the plot and review sections are large and hard to navigate through. If you can clean them up and cut them down I'll review them. I'd also suggest a copy-edit for this article before it passes GA.--Gen. Quon (talk) 16:34, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chris McGarry[edit]

The article Chris McGarry has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.--Logical Fuzz (talk) 09:20, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your unsourced articles[edit]

Just another warning that you really need to add sources to your articles. Both this and this are unacceptable. If you can't be bothered to add sources, don't create the articles.--Logical Fuzz (talk) 09:20, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Let me add this to the list. Its been 9 days, and still you have not added any sources. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 10:07, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm add sources soon. --TBrandley • talk • contributions 14:22, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Awake (TV series) cast[edit]

Template:Awake (TV series) cast has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Logical Fuzz (talk) 21:20, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/Yes Minister/archive1[edit]

Firstly, this is not a list. Secondly you haven't transcluded the nomination. Thirdly you would, if you were taking it seriously, need to identify exactly how it no longer meets the featured article criteria. Please withdraw this as soon as possible and be much more careful in the future. Thanks. Oh, and the FLC for Friends episodes was also not transcluded properly. I have deleted that because you already have one open FLC (please read the FLC instructions regarding multiple open nominations). The Rambling Man (talk) 06:49, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Awake Logo moving.gif[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Awake Logo moving.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bob talk 18:01, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Turtles All the Way Down[edit]

Please see Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Turtles All the Way Down/archive1. - Dank (push to talk) 18:07, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Awake Logo moving.gif)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Awake Logo moving.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 07:02, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RE:GA Notice[edit]

Hi and thanks for the review! I left comments at the review page. All the Best, --Khanassassin ☪ 11:37, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the pass, TBrandley! I appreciate it! :) Best, --Khanassassin ☪ 06:30, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

I'm currently concentrating on getting the Sports and recreation and Episodes nominations down; if I have the time to do Awake, I'll let you know. -- Lemonade51 (talk) 22:27, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. TBrandley • talk • contributions 22:28, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still waiting for you to add references to the articles you created[edit]

OK, it's been a week since you created the unsourced article Pilot (Saving Hope), and I am still waiting for you to add sources. Your comment to me was 6 days ago was "I'm add sources soon". Funny, all you have managed to do is remove the unreferenced tag here after someone else added a reference. The article is still in desperate need of sources to verify the stated facts. And should I mention I'm An Adult Now (The Listener)? It's been 16 days since you created that, and it is still unsourced. Yet you continue to create new articles and work on getting articles to GA or FA status. Why not worry about the basics first? --Logical Fuzz (talk) 02:02, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. I have added some references. Thank you for the reminder. TBran dl ey 03:12, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]