User talk:Ppelberg-test

From Wikipedia

Not working for me.[edit]

I tried to comment following the instructions. First time I tried to save, the message just disappeared. Second attempt the system humg up and I had to close the tab to get out. Firefox/windows 10 desctop. Logged out. Pbsouthwood (talk) 11:14, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for attempting to try the prototype, @Pbsouthwood and for letting us know about the issue you encountered (not being able to publish a comment to the talk page and for that comment to disappear when trying to do so). We have been able to reproduce this issue. Are you able to try the prototype on this talk page ( and reply here whether you were able to successfully publish a comment or not? It seems like this issue is confined to this particular talk page. In the meantime, I've replaced the problematic ( with the one that seems to be working ( PPelberg (WMF) (talk) 16:48, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
Made a few more logged out tests (IP105...) on Talk:Dogs. (don't worry, I am not worried that my IP address may be connected to my username) Seems to work better, but not entirely as I would expect. New sections drop the new system. Cheers, Pbsouthwood (talk) 06:12, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for following up – I'm glad to hear the prototype is now working for you!
A couple clarifying questions...
1. By saying New sections drop the new system. are you referring to the fact that the new system does not support being able to start a new section (e.g. ==New section==) from within the body of a reply?
Yes, and if you start a new section in the normal way there is no reply link on the new content and it is not autosigned either when creating or thereafter. I guess these are all tied together. Pbsouthwood (talk) 09:16, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
2. Are there other ways the new system behaved in ways you didn't expect?
Not sure what to expect really, other than consistency. Pbsouthwood (talk) 09:16, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
what happens here? Ppelberg-test (talk) 15:48, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
...the more details you can share the better. PPelberg (WMF) (talk) 06:21, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
hello testing [[1]] Ppelberg-test (talk) 17:34, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
...the more details you can share the better. PPelberg (WMF) User: RYasmeen (WMF) 01:05, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
test reply User: RYasmeen (WMF) 00:57, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
hello testing [[1]] User: RYasmeen (WMF) 01:06, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
reply to the first message User: RYasmeen (WMF) 01:11, 28 August 2020 (UTC)


hello, this is a test comment Ppelberg-test (talk) 16:51, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

ok and how about a test reply?? Ppelberg-test (talk) 16:52, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
hello Ppelberg-test (talk) 22:17, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
how does this work? Ppelberg-test (talk) 00:05, 9 May 2020 (UTC)


Everything is terrible! Articles are broken and discussions are broken. User1 19:45, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

  • Articles are not broken, they work fine for me.
  • Discussions are not broken, you're just using them wrong.
Please elaborate. User2 19:45, 5 February 2020 (UTC)


Hello, Ppelberg-test, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Ppelberg-test (talk) 23:27, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

In the context of T242184, I'm testing whether this reply has the appropriate change tags applied to it. Ppelberg-test (talk) 21:44, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Fourth reply User: RYasmeen (WMF) 01:09, 28 August 2020 (UTC)


testing 1 Ppelberg-test (talk) 03:11, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Version 2.0[edit]

Megan, how about us having a conversation here using the new reply tool...does that sound like a good idea to you? Ppelberg-test (talk) 20:18, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

sure, sounds good (talk) 20:19, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Bullet point inheritance[edit]

There are three points I would like to peoples' attention:

  • Point 1
  • Point 2
  • Point 3 Ppelberg-test (talk) 18:30, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
    • I'm replying and notice the comment I am drafting will have a "•" prepended to it. Ppelberg-test (talk) 18:31, 13 May 2020 (UTC)


Supporting signatures and statements[edit]

Please cast your vote below. Ppelberg-test (talk) 23:01, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

  1. Symbol support vote.svg Support Ppelberg-test (talk) 23:01, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
  2. Template:Oppose Ppelberg-test (talk) 23:01, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
    1. Support Peter (talk) 01:05, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
    2. Symbol support vote.svg Support Peter (talk) 01:05, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
  3. Symbol support vote.svg Support Peter (talk) 01:05, 7 August 2020 (UTC)


Testing: "Reply tool is adding nowiki tag to multi-lines templates when switching editors." Ppelberg-test (talk) 00:06, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

T253587: experimenting with blockquotes[edit]

test Ppelberg-test (talk) 01:03, 1 June 2020 (UTC)



hello Ppelberg-test (talk) 01:04, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Interleaving comments[edit]


COMMENT 2, LINE 1 Ppelberg-test (talk) 00:00, 24 June 2020 (UTC)


COMMENT 2, LINE 2 Ppelberg-test (talk) 00:00, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

COMMENT 1, LINE 3 Ppelberg-test (talk) 00:00, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

COMMENT 2, LINE 3 Ppelberg-test (talk) 00:00, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Testing interleaving comments with marshall[edit]


Yes, I agree with this comment. -- MMiller Test 01 (talk) 00:04, 24 June 2020 (UTC)


I disagree with this comment. -- MMiller Test 01 (talk) 00:04, 24 June 2020 (UTC)


I have not yet decided about this comment. -- MMiller Test 01 (talk) 00:04, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Ppelberg-test (talk) 00:03, 24 June 2020 (UTC)


  • Comment 1. Peter (talk) 00:46, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Actual reply. Peter (talk) 00:46, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
      • Yes Peter (talk) 00:47, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
        • You again? Peter (talk) 00:47, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Comment 2. Peter (talk) 00:46, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
    Expected reply. Peter (talk) 00:46, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
    Hello Peter (talk) 00:47, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
    Yes? Something to add, sir? Peter (talk) 00:47, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Testing vote[edit]

1) The purpose of Wikipedia is to create a high-quality, free-content encyclopedia in an atmosphere of camaraderie and mutual respect among contributors. Contributors whose actions are detrimental to that goal may be asked to refrain from them, even when these actions are undertaken in good faith; and good faith actions, where disruptive, may still result in sanctions.

  1. GorillaWarfare (talk) 16:07, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
  2. Newyorkbrad (talk) 16:12, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
  3. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:14, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
  4. WormTT(talk) 16:44, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
  5. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 17:59, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
  6. bradv🍁 18:15, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
  7. Mkdw talk 18:22, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
  8. Maxim(talk) 19:10, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
  9. Katietalk 00:25, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
  10. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:12, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
  11. xenotalk 02:37, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
  12. – Joe (talk) 08:34, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
  13. SoWhy 12:54, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Will this scroll?[edit]

test Peter (talk) 00:53, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

test scroll wikieditor[edit]




vote test[edit]

Supporting signatures and statements[edit]


  1. Symbol support vote.svg Support denny (talk) 00:11, 5 May 2020 (UTC) (as proposer)
  2. Symbol support vote.svg Support Seemplez (talk) 10:21, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
  3. Symbol support vote.svg Support Ainali (talk) 19:33, 5 May 2020 (UTC) This is a big, ambitious goal if any.
  4. Symbol support vote.svg SupportArkanosis 19:34, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
  5. Symbol support vote.svg Support GoranSM (talk) 19:35, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
  6. Symbol support vote.svg Support, but I'll also add a few comments :) --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 19:40, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
    Thank you! --denny (talk) 19:49, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
    test Peter (talk) 01:04, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
  7. Symbol support vote.svg Support Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 19:44, 5 May 2020 (UTC) This is indeed a very interesting project. I have not read all of Denny's writing in this aspect, and I still haven't understood how users would be able to easy define "Constructors, Content, and Renderers", but I suppose that is part of a development process. The Wikilambda/Organization is not clear. Who is going to do it. Would Denny be free from Google? Would he be provided by funds from Wikimedia Foundation? What would be the inputs from Magnus Manske?
    Yes, the development process involves tasks to figure out to make the development of constructors, content, and renderers easy. That will be challenging.
    Regarding the organization, that is indeed a bit vague. I would love the Board to tell the Foundation to commit to the project, and then figure out the details (such as funding, personnel, etc). Before that, I think, it would not be fair to ask any individuals to commit. --denny (talk) 20:09, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
  8. Symbol support vote.svg Support Mike Peel (talk) 19:49, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
  9. Symbol support vote.svg Support Thadguidry (talk) 19:53, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
  10. Symbol support vote.svg Support You may want to consider changing the name to WikiLambda since the lower case "L" and upper case "I" are indistinguishable and might be confusing. Fuzheado (talk) 20:01, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
    Yes, the name is just a preliminary strawman! I added your argument and a few others to the page on the name. At least the titles here have serifs! --denny (talk) 20:29, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
    Think that going old school with WikiWords in general with project names would be nice :) Zblace (talk) 17:12, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
    Added to naming page. --denny (talk) 17:46, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
  11. Template:Strong support-- Bodhisattwa (talk) 20:03, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
  12. Template:Strong support TiagoTorrent (talk) 20:04, 5 May 2020 (UTC) This is a very ambitious and promising initiative not only for the wiki community itself, but also for those working with language models in Computational Linguistics. As a member of the former group, I'm really supportive of this project and hope to be able to contribute to it with assorted framenetteries.
  13. Symbol support vote.svg Support Interesting. Well-planned, and very well documented. I am interested and want to join in any capacity. There is a lot to read/watch, specially in the subpages/signpost etc. I'll get back with questions/suggestions (if any). All the best. -- Tito Dutta (talk) 20:11, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
  14. Template:S. --Csisc (talk) 20:32, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
  15. Symbol support vote.svg Support —M@sssly 20:33, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
  16. Template:S -❙❚❚❙❙ JinOy ❚❙❚❙❙ 20:36, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
  17. Template:S --Joalpe (talk) 20:38, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
  18. Template:Strong support Very excited about this.--Akorenchkin (talk) 20:42, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
  19. Symbol support vote.svg Support Sturm (talk) 20:51, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
  20. Symbol support vote.svg Support A logical extension of the work we already do, well-aligned with our mission, and has great promise. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:02, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
  21. Template:S Blue Rasberry (talk) 21:03, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
  22. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Casual (talk) 21:16, 5 May 2020 (UTC).
  23. Template:S Wskent (talk) 21:24, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
  24. Template:S --I9606 (talk) 21:39, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
  25. Symbol support vote.svg Support Petermr (talk) 21:45, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
  26. Template:S --GiFontenelle (talk) 21:51, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
  27. Template:Strong support Lazowik (talk) 21:56, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
  28. Very Template:Strong support Ederporto (talk) 22:34, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
  29. Symbol support vote.svg Support Mitar (talk) 22:44, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
  30. Template:S 非常支持~很需要! bridging a gap that the current Wikimedia movement can better serve its mission. Xinbenlv (talk) 22:52, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
  31. Template:S - PKM (talk) 23:16, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
  32. Template:S An optimal time for this! –SJ talk  23:32, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
  33. Template:S Interesting project, may I propose the name WikiRosetta or WikiSetta?--BugWarp (talk) 01:16, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
    • hello Peter (talk) 01:04, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
    I am adding name proposals and considerations to the naming page. --denny (talk) 03:15, 6 May 2020 (UTC

Vote discussion[edit]

What a vote that was! Peter (talk) 01:10, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Indeed! Peter (talk) 01:10, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
|+ Chemical composition of the crust[1]
!style="font-size: smaller;"|Continental
!style="font-size: smaller;"|Oceanic
|style="text-align: center;"|SiO2
|style="text-align: right;"|60.2%
|style="text-align: right;"|48.6%
|style="text-align: center;"|Al2O3
|style="text-align: right;"|15.2%
|style="text-align: right;"|16.5%
|style="text-align: center;"|CaO
|style="text-align: right;"|5.5%
|style="text-align: right;"|12.3%
|style="text-align: center;"|MgO
|style="text-align: right;"|3.1%
|style="text-align: right;"|6.8%
|iron(II) oxide
|style="text-align: center;"|FeO
|style="text-align: right;"|3.8%
|style="text-align: right;"|6.2%
|sodium oxide
|style="text-align: center;"|Na2O
|style="text-align: right;"|3.0%
|style="text-align: right;"|2.6%
|potassium oxide
|style="text-align: center;"|K2O
|style="text-align: right;"|2.8%
|style="text-align: right;"|0.4%
|iron(III) oxide
|style="text-align: center;"|Fe2O3
|style="text-align: right;"|2.5%
|style="text-align: right;"|2.3%
|style="text-align: center;"|H2O
|style="text-align: right;"|1.4%
|style="text-align: right;"|1.1%
|carbon dioxide
|style="text-align: center;"|CO2
|style="text-align: right;"|1.2%
|style="text-align: right;"|1.4%
|titanium dioxide
|style="text-align: center;"|TiO2
|style="text-align: right;"|0.7%
|style="text-align: right;"|1.4%
|phosphorus pentoxide
|style="text-align: center;"|P2O5
|style="text-align: right;"|0.2%
|style="text-align: right;"|0.3%
!style="text-align: right;"|99.6%
!style="text-align: right;"|99.9%
|} Peter (talk) 23:49, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Testing T257651[edit]

Name since you were the last person to make major changes to the article, is it appropriate for you to congratulating yourself while not disclosing that you were paid to do so? — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 20:07, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

  1. ^ Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named brown_mussett1981; see Help:Cite errors/Cite error references no text ().