User talk:Crest of London/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Template:Usertalkheader Template:Talkarchive

From Time Immemorial[edit]

Hello, Crest of London, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  Prolog 20:02, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Talk pagelogo123.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Talk pagelogo123.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:11, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Commons[edit]

Hiya, cheers for your pictures of Harringay railway station. Can I encourage you to upload then direct to Wikimedia Commons, where they will reach an even wider audience. The process is just as easy. Railwayfan2005 (talk) 20:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stub templates[edit]

Please don't create your own stub templates without discussion, as you did here. Although it seems at first glance like bureaucracy, we have quite strict rules on what stub categories are appropriate, to stop the creation of categories with only a couple of members and to stop the list of stub categories from getting unmanageably large. If you want to propose the creation of new categories, please discuss your proposed new category at WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals to gain a broad consensus for it.

Thanks! – iridescent 20:39, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Talk pagelogo1234.jpg[edit]

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Talk pagelogo1234.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  – iridescent 20:52, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you claim you got the owners permission, you're going to have to show some pretty serious proof, given that Transport for London and Wikipedia never allow permission to use their logo (hence the rather peculiar logo for WP:WikiProject London Transport) and I find it hard to believe that either Microsoft or Adobe have granted you permission to release their logos into the public domain. You are obviously here in good faith; please don't put me in a position where I have to block you from editing to stop you getting us into trouble or disrupting other editors' work. – iridescent 21:07, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reply by L07ChLeo3[edit]

I am sorry for any inconvenience I have caused all if not most of the problems with my article have been rectified once again I am very sorry L07ChLeo3 21:35, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Talk pagelogo123.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Talk pagelogo123.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Wikimedia Commons[edit]

Hiya, cheers for your pictures of Harringay railway station. Can I encourage you to upload then direct to Wikimedia Commons, where they will reach an even wider audience. The process is just as easy. Railwayfan2005 (talk) 20:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stub templates[edit]

Please don't create your own stub templates without discussion, as you did here. Although it seems at first glance like bureaucracy, we have quite strict rules on what stub categories are appropriate, to stop the creation of categories with only a couple of members and to stop the list of stub categories from getting unmanageably large. If you want to propose the creation of new categories, please discuss your proposed new category at WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals to gain a broad consensus for it.

Thanks! – iridescent 20:39, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Talk pagelogo1234.jpg[edit]

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Talk pagelogo1234.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  – iridescent 20:52, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you claim you got the owners permission, you're going to have to show some pretty serious proof, given that Transport for London and Wikipedia never allow permission to use their logo (hence the rather peculiar logo for WP:WikiProject London Transport) and I find it hard to believe that either Microsoft or Adobe have granted you permission to release their logos into the public domain. You are obviously here in good faith; please don't put me in a position where I have to block you from editing to stop you getting us into trouble or disrupting other editors' work. – iridescent 21:07, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reply by L07ChLeo3[edit]

I am sorry for any inconvenience I have caused all if not most of the problems with my article have been rectified one again I am very sorry L07ChLeo3 21:35, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to WPLT![edit]

Welcome!

Hi, and welcome to the London Transport WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of London's transport system.

A few features that you might find helpful:

  • You may want to join or create a task force which attempts to drive the improvement of articles within a smaller scope.
  • The project also provides templates to help you make the perfect article.

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around!

— From the members of WikiProject London Transport

UNI|SOUTH 19:55, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tottenham and Hampstead Junction Railway[edit]

Hi L07ChLeo3,

I see that you changed the boxes on the Tottenham and Hampstead Junction Railway station articles to show that the route forking after St Ann's Road railway station to Tottenham Hale or to South Tottenham. This is the same thing I did when editing the articles initially but then I decided that I was probably mistaken. You see, St Ann's Road only opened in 1882 and the route to Tottenham Hale seems to have finished in 1870 (after the first incarnation of the line had been a commercial flop). By the time St Ann's Road opened the line was running on its current route via South Tottenham. If I am right then Haringey Green Lanes was the station before Tottenham Hale at the time that Tottenham Hale was in use. Does that make sense? More to the point, is it correct? Was there a post 1882 service on the line which served Tottenham Hale that I am not aware of? If so then the boxes are correct as they are. If not, then I think we should change them back. What do you think?

BTW: It would be very useful if there were some old timetables we could use to check these things against. Do you know of any good sites for these?

--DanielRigal (talk) 18:18, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reply[edit]

Thank you I am mistaken sorry I don't know any good websites... thanks for the notification L07ChLeo3 18:21, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

File:A sign of Harringay railway station on one of its platforms.JPG[edit]

Just to let you know that I recently copied the above image that you uploaded to Wikipedia over to WikiMedia Commons, the Wikimedia central media repository for all free media. The image had been tagged with the {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}} template. Your image is now available to all Wikimedia projects at the following location: Commons:File:A sign of Harringay railway station on one of its platforms.JPG. The original version of the image uploaded to Wikipedia has been tagged with WP:CSD#I8. Cheers! --Captain-tucker (talk) 02:18, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

London Buses[edit]

I am aware that you are a major editor of London Bus articles. I have therefore decided to let you know that the following bus routes have been merged into one article, London School Buses:

  1. London Buses route 603
  2. London Buses route 605
  3. London Buses route 606
  4. London Buses route 611
  5. London Buses route 616
  6. London Buses route 632
  7. London Buses route 640

Spacevezon (talk) 17:22, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reply[edit]

Thank you for the information I will help out by finding more or making constructive edits. --L07ChLeo3 (talk) 23:35, 13 February 2009 (UTC)L07ChLeo3 22:09, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image:L07ChLeo3's user page logo.jpg missing description details[edit]

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:L07ChLeo3's user page logo.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers. If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. §hepTalk 00:19, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reply[edit]

A:please take into note the rule of this page you have clearly done this without taking this rule into consideration B:It is my work and is designed for my user page only; I seriously doubt that it can be used in any more articles

L07ChLeo3 (talk) 11:41, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CODE 2000[edit]

I see that you use code 2000.

Another useful font which covers less characters (but more Latin and Cyrillic letters/glyphs) is Doulos SIL. It can be downloaded here: [1]

GNR[edit]

A new template has been created:

Template:Great Northern Route

Feb metro[edit]

Wikipedia:WikiProject London Transport/The Metropolitan/Issue 11 Simply south not SS, sorry 14:47, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, thank you for the prompt. Simply south not SS, sorry 14:47, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Wikipedia Signpost — February 16, 2009[edit]

Wikipedia:Signpost/Template:Signpost-header

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist.
If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 07:00, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your request for rollback[edit]

After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback can be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback may be removed at any time.

If you no longer want rollback, then contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some information on how to use rollback, you can view this page. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, just leave me a message if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Happy editing! PeterSymonds (talk) 20:14, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

I suggest you state your months of activity in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Admin_coaching/Requests_for_Coaching. Sorry I do not know how to move 1 of your section to the archive and hence I have to break the 10 sections rule. Syjytg (talk) 14:40, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be ignoring my advice. Syjytg (talk) 12:53, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry[edit]

Sorry I haven't had the time to fix that error it has been rectified now thanks L07ChLeo3 (talk) 19:54, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Noticed you had problems with the syntax, I have helped you done it. Syjytg (talk) 08:49, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost — February 23, 2009[edit]

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:

The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week.

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 02:00, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


RfA[edit]

I reverted your edit to the RfA page because it is incomplete. If you wish to request adminship, please follow the instructions on that page. However, I strongly suggest you reconsider such a request. For a very recent example of a user making that request prematurely, please look at his talk page. Also, you just got rollback privileges last week, and also requested coaching...it seems a little early to be requesting adminship at this time. If you have any questions, please let me know. (I'm watching your talk page.)  Frank  |  talk  19:21, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, why me? Syjytg (talk) 21:00, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Simply a very recent example. I think you'll agree that your experience was a bit unpleasant (it certainly looked that way from the outside), and I'm trying to avoid another, similar situation.  Frank  |  talk  21:03, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost — 2 March 2009[edit]

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 20:02, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your RFA[edit]

I'd suggest you have a quick look at WP:NOTNOW and some of the links from that page. Your RFA stands almost no chance of success, and it may be better to withdraw gracefuly than end up getting irritated by a host of opposes and neutrals. Sorry to be so negative. Pedro :  Chat  22:24, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have taken your edit here as a sign that you wanted to withdraw this request. I have thus closed it accordingly. I hope you will continue to work on Wikipedia and retry with improved odds in a few months. Regards SoWhy 00:08, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please don't take your RFA as being personal; it isn't! RFA on enWP is a very hard thing to pass. I've been here since 2006 and haven't tried yet because I'm not sure I'd pass; and I'm an admin at simple.wikipedia.org Take a couple of days off from wikipedia and just enjoy your real-life. Your on-life will be here later :) All the best!! :-) fr33kman -s- 03:28, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:L07ChLeo3's user page logo.jpg missing description details[edit]

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:L07ChLeo3's user page logo.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers. If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. §hepTalk 21:14, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost — 9 March 2009[edit]

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 23:59, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ACC Tool[edit]

Thank you for applying to access the account creation tool. Unfortunately I was unable to process your request. The ACC tool is a powerful program, and at the present time your account is either too new for us to determine whether you would know how to properly use the tool or that you have not attained the necessary level of trust to be granted access. Please don't take this personally and feel free to contact me if you have any questions. FunPika 00:11, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Frequently used idea and approved areas[edit]

The Frequently used idea are needs updating seriously and now the future of the approved area is questioned. Please see the discussions at Wikipedia talk:Motto of the day/Nominations#Help with FUI and Approved area discussion.

I am also exceedingly busy at the mo.

Simply south (talk) 22:51, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Wikipedia Signpost — 16 March 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost  — 16 March 2009

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 23:08, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of scholarly publications by Norman Wengert[edit]

I gather you just tagged this page for speedy deletion, at the same time I placed a substantial number of references on the page. Now they have all dispappeared, and were removed from the Norman Wengert page. Do you know how to recover them? I do not, and I'm not looking forward to making the list up again from scratch. Please? Mervyn Emrys (talk) 23:59, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The references are still there don't worry. L07ChLeo3 (talk) 00:02, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Where? Can't see them. Checked. Mervyn Emrys (talk) 00:21, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I concur that the information seems to have disappeared from both the article and the relevant edit histories, an act which I am puzzled by, yet would appear to be the case. LO7ChLeo3, I accept your reasoning for tagging the article for speedy deletion. However, I believe you should have given more time to allow the creator a chance to develop the article further before tagging. I have also advised the creator to employ an under construction tag in future. Allventon (talk) 01:55, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry for the information I was merely hasty but the reason why the edit history may have gone is because an Oversighter must have deleted it; they have the power to delete pages PERMANENTLY which would explain why the history may have disappeared however I will see what I can do. L07ChLeo3 (talk) 20:34, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: NewPageWatcher[edit]

Done. Sorry for the wait. Cheers, –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 20:54, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NPP[edit]

Do carry on the new page patrolling but please note that ham prefix was most certainly not nonsense. Also please always provide an edit summary - there is a flag in your preferences that you should turn on to remind you about it.

Please don't try and apply a rule such as ten articles. I am most certainly not going to do any archiving for you. If you won't do your own archiving then use MiszaBot. See also this re SHOUTING. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 23:53, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion[edit]

Thanks for telling me. Spacevezon (talk) 20:35, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

stubs[edit]

Hi, Please don't add {{stub}} to articles like Passy-Kéli when they already have categorised stub tags - it just wastes the time of people at WP:STUBSORT. If you feel the article needs expanding, Wikifying, etc there are plenty of other templates you can use. Thanks, PamD (talk) 22:24, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ACC[edit]

{{helpme}}

Hello whenever I try to make an account on the ACC (Account Creator Control) interface I am told I already have an account on it and that my username is already registered but on the message I was sent about a week earlier it says that my account wasn't ready for creation which means that my account hadn't been made on the ACC so why am I getting that Error message! Can anyone help please? Thanks. L07ChLeo3 (talk) 20:19, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You should ask this question at WT:ACC. //roux   20:23, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. L07ChLeo3 (talk) 20:24, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Charlie Sheen's Brother[edit]

Just letting you know, I've replaced your speedy with a prod, because it doesn't look like its advertising the game at all, it just looks completely made up, but it isn't speedy material. Keep up the new page patrolling! Regards, FingersOnRoids♫ 21:45, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 23 March 2009[edit]

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:52, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

Template:Unblock reviewed

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

I've had a checkuser look into this, and it seems I was mistaken on the sockpuppetry. You have been unblocked, and should be able to edit again. I apologize for the confusion. Your bot I will leave blocked for now - it should not be making edits without approval anyway, unless it's only making edits to your own userspace. If this is the case, or when it gets approval for a trial, post an unblock request on its talk page with this account and it will be unblocked.

Request handled by: Hersfold (t/a/c) 09:22, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

Why did you post identical unblock requests then? You've also suddenly come up on an IP address blocked by a checkuser in response to severe abuse of multiple accounts. Hersfold (t/a/c) 08:39, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
We were merely nearby each other. We are both avid contributors to Wikipedia. When we try to edit Wikipedia from our school ip address we can't as it has been hardblocked and I got the idea from him to request ip block exemption when I saw him requesting it thus I tried to do it, I can say, truthfully and honestly that we are not the same person. L07ChLeo3 (talk) 08:43, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the unblock I am sorry for any confusion caused, I don't mind that the bot is blocked as the source code is taking a while to construct and it won't be finished for some time now. Anyway I'm babbling too much. Cheers. --L07ChLeo3 (talk) 11:04, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:W4 Bus whl.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:W4 Bus whl.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jenuk1985 | Talk 16:51, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Palmers Green station Platforms looking Northbound.JPG listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Palmers Green station Platforms looking Northbound.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jenuk1985 | Talk 17:09, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Platforms facing Southbound at Palmers Green station.JPG listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Platforms facing Southbound at Palmers Green station.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jenuk1985 | Talk 17:10, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Unblock-auto reviewed

{{helpme}}

Hello, I have a question, how do I persuade my friends and others to not vandalize Wikipedia as they keep doing it, can anyone give some answers. Thanks. L07ChLeo3 (talk) 20:57, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You tell them not to. In any case, that's probably not something you should ask using the helpme template. Killiondude (talk) 21:04, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ok thanks. L07ChLeo3 (talk) 21:08, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I can honestly say that I have not vandalized Wikipedia I am sorry if people from my ip address are causing distress they often bully me for having an interest in Wikipedia and thus I am often the subject of their random attacks but I can honestly say I do not vandalize Wikipedia, I'll wait for the autoblock to lift if I have to but I do not like people thinking that I am a dishonest Wikipedian. L07ChLeo3 (talk) 21:35, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 30 March 2009[edit]

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 20:50, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 6 April 2009[edit]

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 19:16, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April Metro[edit]

Wikipedia:WikiProject London Transport/The Metropolitan/Issue 12

Btw, if you or OllieFury, as you may know this newsletter is meant to be monthly but i have been unable to do so. Are you or they or both interested in creating Issue 13 (which if on track should be at the start of May)? Simply south (talk) 11:47, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 13 April 2009[edit]

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 16:29, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 20 April 2009[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 18:45, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 27 April 2009[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:25, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Crest_of_London/Archive_1&oldid=96892"