User:Shannon1/AlisoCreek
Appearance
Template:WikiProject status This is an inactive WikiProject for the expansion of Aliso Creek.
Overview[edit]
Article will be assessed every ten or so days starting May 7, 2009. A peer review will be requested likely in late May or Early June. (INACTIVE)
Article has passed GA without major incident, and has grown a lot since it was accepted.
As of 7 May 2009, "readable content" is about 37,000 bytes. See User:Shannon1/AlisoCreek/PageSizeEstimate for details and the test.
User:AndyZ/Suggestions is a useful page.
The development of the article[edit]
- When just created (471 bytes) (Gargamayo12 is one of my old accounts.)
- The first time I edited it under this account (5630 bytes)
- When first rewritten (6474 bytes)
- Beginning to develop... (9990 bytes)
- When nominated for GA (19278 bytes)
- Passed GA (35883 bytes)
- Current revision (Around 67000 bytes)
Totals for FA Review[edit]
Total amount | Score | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Points | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 102 (max.) |
May 7 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 68 |
May 16 |
Aliso Creek- FA Review (20090507)[edit]
It is:[edit]
- Well written?
- Comprehensive?
- Well researched?
- Thorough, representative survey of relative literature: Don’t know.
- Reliable sources: Most sources are either from Orange County Watershed, a local government source that should be credible, or from a large array of different news articles, which all largely agree on info.
- References and inline citations: Has a sufficient references section (50-something refs) and has many inline citations, mostly formatted correctly and only needs minor cleanup for repeats.
- Neutral?
- Stable?
Style guidelines[edit]
- Lead section?
- Appropriate structure:
- Images?
- Length?